wehrmacht awards


Go Back   Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums > Wehrmacht Uniforms and Equipment > Firearms Forum

Firearms Forum Focused on the guns of the Third Reich, but posts on firearms from other WW II countries are also welcomed.

View Poll Results: Best Infantry Rifle of WWII?
FG42 71 4.69%
Stg44 504 33.27%
K98 194 12.81%
M1 Garand 540 35.64%
M1 Carbine 29 1.91%
SVT-40 (and later varients) 30 1.98%
Lee-Enfield No.1 MkIII 73 4.82%
Nagant M39 14 0.92%
G41 (Mauser or Walther) 10 0.66%
G/K43 50 3.30%
Voters: 1515. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 06-27-2011, 05:29 PM   #301
wags
Association Member
 
wags's Avatar
 
wags is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: out west
Posts: 2,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbc98k View Post
I am really suprised the M1 Garand is winning.
30 round mag that can be topped off vs 8 round clip that can not be topped off
Select fire vs semi auto only
Intermediate round that the soldier could carry more of and control on full auto
STG44 stamped steel construction that was relatively cheap and easy to produce
Both are reliable weapons, but any 65 year old weapon could be a little finky in the hands of a civilian shooter.
Ever have the M1 thumb?
I do like the M1 Garand, its a great semi auto battle rifle that gave the US soldier a powerful tool against the axis. However the STG44 was ahead of its time, and the assault rifle continues to prove itself as the standard rifle on battlefields in the 21st century. On a bench rest at 500 meters + the M1 Garand has the edge but on a WWII battlefield I would want my troops equipped with assault rifles. The STG44 just has too many advantages over the M1 Garand to be ignored on this poll. I want a recount!
I have to agree with the above posting 100%.
There just seems there is too much 'e-motion' when it comes to the Garand.

Say this: your going into hostile combat conditions...which weapon would you choose the Garand or Stg-44? Lets see...how many times can you fire before you need to reload? How long does reloading take? How much ammo can you carry given the same weight? Does one rifle give a distinct sound when it is empty? Can you reload a partial magazine quickly to a full mag?
I could go on.
But I know which one I would grab.

-wagner-
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2011, 07:32 PM   #302
bodes
Member
 
bodes's Avatar
 
bodes is online now
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wags View Post
I have to agree with the above posting 100%.
There just seems there is too much 'e-motion' when it comes to the Garand.

Say this: your going into hostile combat conditions...which weapon would you choose the Garand or Stg-44? Lets see...how many times can you fire before you need to reload? How long does reloading take? How much ammo can you carry given the same weight? Does one rifle give a distinct sound when it is empty? Can you reload a partial magazine quickly to a full mag?
I could go on.
But I know which one I would grab.

-wagner-
Wagner, I'd say your argument would hold some water IF the vast majority of the world's forces carried "assault weapons".......However, the majority of the world's fighting men were issued bolt-action rifles and not assault rifles......So, when it came to the basic fighting rifle, the garand was unquestionably superior.....

Also, do not forget the WW2 designed assault weapons pretty much died out following the war.....Yes, they saw some action in Yugoslavia and the rest of eastern Europe, but were quickly replaced by the AK-47......The Kalashnikov was of different design and superior to that of Germany's.....The garand on the other hand, was designed in 1929, accepted by the US Army in 1936, and saw action up into Viet Nam and beyond.....Very much a proven infantry weapon.....Bodes
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2011, 09:29 PM   #303
jbc98k
New Member
 
jbc98k's Avatar
 
jbc98k is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KY
Posts: 42
Default

"Wagner, I'd say your argument would hold some water IF the vast majority of the world's forces carried "assault weapons".......However, the majority of the world's fighting men were issued bolt-action rifles and not assault rifles......So, when it came to the basic fighting rifle, the garand was unquestionably superior....."

Bodes I am not really sure I am following you on this one. Are you saying the assault rifle is not an infantry rifle so it should not be included on this poll? The Germans were trying to make the STG44 the basic fighting rifle toward the end of 1944, they just bumped into a few problems before they could finnish the task. As far as the M1 Garand being an older design that was still around during the Vietnam war, just because something is an older design does not make it better. The AK47 was a different design but it is like the STG44 a true assault rifle. Intermediate cartridge, high capacity mag, and select fire. The three item I just mention makes the STG44 the best rifle of WWII. As I mentioned the Germans were trying to make the STG44 their standard rifle so my vote remains with the STG44.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2011, 09:50 PM   #304
bodes
Member
 
bodes's Avatar
 
bodes is online now
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbc98k View Post
Bodes I am not really sure I am following you on this one. Are you saying the assault rifle is not an infantry rifle so it should not be included on this poll?
It's an infantry rifle, however not all infantry rifles are "assault rifles"......Today's definition of an assault weapon is a high capacity magazine rifle which uses a intermediate round and has select fire capabilities.....As stated before, apples and oranges......Bodes
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2011, 09:58 PM   #305
jbc98k
New Member
 
jbc98k's Avatar
 
jbc98k is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KY
Posts: 42
Default

Excellent Bodes! we agree on what an assault rifle is and the STG44 was a rifle that was ahead of its time and had many advantages over the M1Garand.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-27-2011, 10:07 PM   #306
bodes
Member
 
bodes's Avatar
 
bodes is online now
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbc98k View Post
Excellent Bodes! we agree on what an assault rifle is and the STG44 was a rifle that was ahead of its time and had many advantages over the M1Garand.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-28-2011, 06:43 AM   #307
jbc98k
New Member
 
jbc98k's Avatar
 
jbc98k is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KY
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bodes View Post
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2011, 06:55 PM   #308
Robbi
Association Member
 
Robbi is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 73
Default

Anyone like the BAR as much as I do?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-28-2011, 09:27 PM   #309
Finnishlion142
Member
 
Finnishlion142's Avatar
 
Finnishlion142 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Outer Heaven
Posts: 153
Default

"In a man to man fight the winner is the one who puts an extra round in his magazine"
-Field Marshal Erwin Rommel

My vote is for the STG 44.
  Reply With Quote

Fg42
Old 10-09-2011, 10:06 PM   #310
pitfighter
Member
 
pitfighter's Avatar
 
pitfighter is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: AZ, USA.
Posts: 166
Default Fg42

The FG42 was a sensational gamble.
There are several reasons I think it was an outstanding weapon for it's era.
It was a select fire package that weighed the same, and was as short as or shorter than most intermediary round assault weapons, but the FG42 fired the full power 7.92mm round.

It fed from a 20 round box mag, but the mag was horizontal, so did not affect your prone silhouette height. Some have said this weight could throw off your aim, they are correct that it may lopside the rifle slightly if you limp wrist it, as if you were an eleven year old girl, and even then, it shouldn't throw off your aim.

It fired from the closed bolt in semi for greater accuracy, but open bolt when fully automatic was engaged, so less chance of a cook off.

It had an integral bipod and bayonet, full automatic prone from bipod position was very steady.

It had an advanced muzzle brake, to deal with the hi power cartridge's recoil.

It also had a reciprocating stock.

The sights are fold away, much like current combat assault weapons.

Spectacularly simple to disassemble and clean.

I feel the FG42 was a magnificent experiment, years ahead of it's time, that took a very typically Luftwaffe, hyper pragmatic approach to the assessment and design of a battlefield weapon.
Instead of issuing your troop intermediary round assault weapons and one or two GPMGs, you had the option of having every man carry a form of hybrid intermediary GPMG.
I think in time they would have designed a way for the FG to accept MG42 belts as well as mags, with a slightly more robust or quick change barrel.
(no more rifles, smgs, assault weapons or gpmgs)

I think the weapon would have become a major success, if certain political and military decisions hadn't lessened the importance of the FJ trooper in general.

The FG was clearly a source of inspiration for the M60 gmpg in later years.

Jesse.

Last edited by pitfighter; 10-09-2011 at 10:17 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011, 07:46 AM   #311
Messheresmit
Association Member
 
Messheresmit's Avatar
 
Messheresmit is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Weber View Post
Man those are awesome photos of the Stg44!

So far no real surprises on this poll. The M1 Garand was definately an excellent all-around rifle. It doesn' surprise me at all that it has the most votes right now.

However, I voted for the Stg44 as well. It was years ahead of its' time. It was easier to produce, had a 30 round magazine, selective fire, was impervious to the elements, and is the for-runner for all modern military service rifles.

Matt

Hi.

My opinion is the same.

Regards.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-26-2011, 12:58 PM   #312
Crossfire
New Member
 
Crossfire is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West Yorks
Posts: 1
Default

While I agree that the late 'Assault Rifle' types were ahead of their time in design and concept, in reality they did not live up to expectations. Soldiers were instructed not to use full auto etc because of the flimsy construction and poor quality materials. While the older bolt actions were obsolete, heavy and slow to use, they were very well made and ultra reliable !!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-2012, 03:22 PM   #313
GUNHEEP
New Member
 
GUNHEEP is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CLEVELAND, OHIO
Posts: 22
Default

Although the mp44 proved to be the forerunner of the modern day assult rifle..i myself have owned six at one time in the past...we are talking about the best rifle of WWII...and that would be the M1 garand..if the germans were armed with mp44's as we were armed with M1 garands? Then we would probally be speaking german and not being able to own any firearms or gun forums for that matter...
The M1 garand gave the world freedom and made the world what it is today..and that is why it is THE BEST RIFLE OF WWII....


Happy Memorial Day
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2012, 01:00 AM   #314
pitfighter
Member
 
pitfighter's Avatar
 
pitfighter is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: AZ, USA.
Posts: 166
Default

Good post, Andy -


Pit.
I think the winning and losing of WW2 boiled down to a more complex set of circumstances than the quality of personal infantry arms, but I like the way you think.

Last edited by pitfighter; 09-27-2012 at 01:11 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2012, 08:12 AM   #315
mdk220
Association Member
 
mdk220's Avatar
 
mdk220 is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 193
Default

STG44 then the M1 - just think if the german soldier was able to use this gun earlier then Mr Hitler allowed them. I have a 1943 M1 and it is a great rifle but 8 rounds compared to 30 - I would take the 30 rds any day. Also the germans were bombed and getting the MP44 then the STG44 was an big effort!

Another thing is the M1 was heavier then the stg44 so the soldier could carry more rounds too!!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help to ID British army patches CVRC British and Commonwealth Militaria 20 12-11-2003 01:11 PM
A book list for our hobby : Part 5 Units history/ organization & Bibliographies Denis Book Review and Media 6 01-24-2003 04:20 PM






vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Wehrmacht-Awards.com