wehrmacht awards


Go Back   Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums > Ken Jasper International Militaria Forums > Imperial Militaria Forum

Imperial Militaria Forum The discussion and study of Imperial German awards and of their Central Powers Allies from the First World War

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

"Thin" EK2 frame beading vs "Fat" EK2 frame beading.
Old 03-18-2004, 07:04 PM   #1
Tony & Kaiser
Member
 
Tony & Kaiser's Avatar
 
Tony & Kaiser is offline
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Neu Braunschweig Kanada
Posts: 1,780
Question "Thin" EK2 frame beading vs "Fat" EK2 frame beading.

This is related to a recent discussion we had about when "fat" frame beading may have been first used. I am going out on a limb here, so will someone please catch me if I fall? The steps to my hypothesis:

1. Standard 1870 and 1914 EK2 have thin frame beading. However, occasionally one will surface with what looks almost like "fat" TR (Third Reich) style frame beading.

2. In every reference book I have examined the variation of the 1939 EK referred to as "Shinckleform" claims that the these were made from Imperial EK frame tooling etc. The outer edge does have the shape of pre-1918 EK2 with a "1939" core, but why is the beading on the frames fat like a standard 1939 EK2 and not thin like the 1914s?

3. Does it not make sense that if these "Shinckleform" 1939 EK2 use "leftover Imperial parts and tooling" then the frame beading would be thin?

4. "Jogendstil." the German version of "Art Deco" originated in 1920 and emphasized the functional design that was based on logic and geometry. The climax of Art Deco came in 1925 with the "Paris Exposition International des Arts Decorative et Industries."

5. Hypothesis: Perhaps the occasional 1870 and 1914 EK2 we encounter with "fat" frame beading were made very soon after the Great War during the advent of Art Deco in the early 1920s as these EK no longer came under Imperial decree and simply reflect the fashion of the time. When the TR developed the standard pattern for the 1939 EK, they adopted this pattern of fat frame beading, but the shape of the EK also evolved and altered the shape of the arms as we all know. So in fact, is it possible that the Shinckleform 1939 is actually not from left-over 1914 stock, but left-over stock by one (or more) manufacturers who were making EK in the early 1920s? These EK with the fatter frame beading are simply a manufacturer's response to current style. The numbers must not have been great, as consequently, any EK, be it 1870, 1914, or 1939 with the Imperial shape but fat frame beading, are not commonly encountered.



Does anyone have their arms out? Or am I going to land flat on my face here?
Tony

(*Note* Sebastian kindly allowed me to use the photo of the "Shinckleform" 1939 of his EK page on this site)
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2004, 07:10 PM   #2
George Stimson
Forums Moderator
 
George Stimson's Avatar
 
George Stimson is offline
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California
Posts: 16,129
Default

Well, here are two Schinkel-form 1939 EK 2s. The one on the left has the fat beading. The one on the right (to my eye) does not. (Different numbers, too.)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg twoschinks.jpg (59.6 KB, 246 views)
__________________
George
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2004, 07:16 PM   #3
Eric Stahlhut
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would tend to rule out the 'Jugendstil' theory, since the style originated in Munich shortly before the turn of the century. Can't have any Bohemian Bavarians redesigning Prussian medals, no sir!
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2004, 07:25 PM   #4
Bill M
Lifetime Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Bill M is offline
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,689
Default

--Very interesting, Tony!
--What it looks like to me is that the `39's went through a metamorphosis. First struck with Imperial tooling and then 'modernized' with a slightly altered (but still Imperial sized) frame before Adolph finally stepped in and had them made bigger and clunkier.
--That's a very nice cross to the right there, George!
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2004, 07:27 PM   #5
Tony & Kaiser
Member
 
Tony & Kaiser's Avatar
 
Tony & Kaiser is offline
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Neu Braunschweig Kanada
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Stimson
Well, here are two Schinkel-form 1939 EK 2s. The one on the left has the fat beading. The one on the right (to my eye) does not.
George, I would agree that the "thin beading" ones could refelect 1914 stocks; but what about these fat beaded ones?

Eric, my understanding was that 'Jugendstil' reached it's height in 1920, but no matter, lets stick with "Art Decco" then and leave those Bavarians out of it.

But; does any of this make any sence re: the fat beaded EKs with Imperial shapes?
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2004, 07:27 PM   #6
Eric Stahlhut
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Personally,

I think that the designers who revamped the EK form during the 30's were acting on orders from the NSDAP leadership who merely wanted a design that made the cross look stronger (henceforth the thicker plated beading, which accentuated the swastika in the center) and as a result made the cross look less graceful, I..M humble O. They certainly continued to manufacture '14s and commemorative '70s for whatever purpose with all sorts of different variations because the process occurred over a period of years.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-2004, 09:52 AM   #7
George Stimson
Forums Moderator
 
George Stimson's Avatar
 
George Stimson is offline
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California
Posts: 16,129
Default

Another question I've never heard answered about these EKs is that if they were supposedly made from leftover stocks of Imperial frames, how come so many are available today that are one-piece constructed?
__________________
George
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-2004, 11:16 AM   #8
Frank Heukemes
Lifetime Member
 
Frank Heukemes's Avatar
 
Frank Heukemes is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, Europe Lifetime Member # 65
Posts: 14,698
Default

Jugendstil (English "Art Nouveau") and Art Deco are two different epochs of European art. Jugendstil is ca. 1895 until 1914, Art Deco 20ies and 30ies.
__________________
Cheers, Frank

  Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-2004, 01:10 PM   #9
Chris_Werner
Member
 
Chris_Werner's Avatar
 
Chris_Werner is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest America
Posts: 1,849
Default

That may be so, but I think Tony's got something here that could be researched further. Perhaps the beading thickening was to compensate for the revised and larger EK style in general. Imperials seem more graceful.
And, maybe off subject, but has anyone seen the die flaws in the beading on private purchase Imperial EKs like you would see on a late war T.R. Deumer?
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump






vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Wehrmacht-Awards.com