| Communications Equipment Radio, telephony and radar equipment |
 |
NOT good Panzer headset at E-stand |
 |
08-05-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#1
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
NOT good Panzer headset at E-stand
I'm starting this thread to discuss the following item.:
Some days ago I saw this ad:
http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=610839
Price seemed OK but when I started looking at the pics I realised they were not good. IMO the headband and rubber pads could be good but the earphones are not Panzer, or at least dfh.b as should be.
I contacted the seller because I thought perhaps he didn't know they were wrong. He was very thankful but when I went back to the ad, the headset had already been sold.
Carles
|
|
|
|
08-05-2012, 10:08 AM
|
#2
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
more pics:
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012, 07:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
|
|
|
|
08-19-2012, 01:27 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Hue is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Newport, Oregon, USA
Posts: 72
|
What is the complaint about this headset? It's stamped Dfh.b. after all. It doesn't have the maker code, true, and the leads are spring loaded (which seems a good idea), and i'd be tempted to guess it's just a variant from another producer.
|
|
|
|
08-19-2012, 01:42 PM
|
#5
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
Those that have a spring are no maker's improvement but dfh. a earphones, for field telephone sets not panzer ones. The dfh.b you can see is on the headband, I can imagine the earphone speakers are marked dfh.a not b. It is much cheaper to complete a panzer set with telephone speakers than to do it with the correct panzer ones.
Carles
|
|
|
|
08-19-2012, 01:53 PM
|
#6
|
|
Association Member
Nick Komiya is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,183
|
|
|
|
|
08-19-2012, 03:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Hue is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Newport, Oregon, USA
Posts: 72
|
Well, i should have guessed that headphones would soon be faked. At least with the dealer's $679 upgraded non-Dfh.b., you get a valuable paragraph on how important radio communications was; i'm sure that text is a major part of the selling price.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
08-20-2012, 02:15 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Funksammler is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Normandy
Posts: 1,106
|
The Dfh.a and Dfh.b (and Dfh.f for that matter) both have the same impedance and are all used with radio. They have small mechanical differences but functionally identical. The "b" earpiece has an extra leather sleeve for extra pull projection, but otherwise the earpiece is interchangeable. The "b" was a version for high ambient noise environments and is certainly not exclusive to tanks. They were also issued in radio cars for example, together with Dhf.a's.
When used in tanks, the cables would often snag, and I have seen more than one Dfh.b with damaged or replaced cables. At least some of these replacements were done as field repairs, it would have been a simple job for a funker to exchange the earpieces of a Dfh.b with those of a Dfh.a. When fitting a replacement cable the leather pull protection was often omitted.
I don't believe this is the work of fakers (fakers usually take care that things superficially look the same). These changes were done by people who valued working headphones over a textbook defective example and I believe at least some of these are period repairs.
regards,
Funksammler
|
|
|
|
08-20-2012, 04:44 AM
|
#9
|
|
Association Member
Nick Komiya is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,183
|
Of course, that applies to militaria in general. Repairs and modifications did happen, but those that no longer retain the factory specs are not in original condition, and there is no knowing when or by whom changes had been made. So the majority of collectors need a text book description, so they can judge for themselves whether the deviation from the norm is within their comfort zone. I for one believe that there are a number of post war put together sets and that deviations do often mean a risk of deception.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2012, 05:55 AM
|
#10
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
The first headset might have been repaired or modified during the war, and are not 100% Panzer, but those in the second ad are a clear example of post war modification. You can see the cables and plugs are Czech kind, used on captured German tanks post war. They are no fakes but been repaired or maintained. Once again a seller ignores that fact or decided not to mention it, so are not 100% original, as stated. The rubber pads appear to be fake/repro, though.
Carles
Last edited by me6_130; 08-20-2012 at 06:02 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2012, 05:57 AM
|
#11
|
|
Association Member
me6_130 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mare Nostrum, Europe
Posts: 2,937
|
Pics of the second ad:
|
|
|
|
08-30-2012, 10:04 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Funksammler is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Normandy
Posts: 1,106
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funksammler
... it would have been a simple job for a funker to exchange the earpieces of a Dfh.b with those of a Dfh.a. When fitting a replacement cable the leather pull protection was often omitted....
|
The opposite happens too, here are some 45 dated Dfh.b's (leather and all) on a late war Dfh.a headband.... I had these for a while, just never noticed they were Dfh.b's...
regards,
Funksammler
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|